{"id":488,"date":"2010-07-24T01:32:24","date_gmt":"2010-07-24T08:32:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mpsharp.com\/blog\/?p=488"},"modified":"2010-07-24T01:32:24","modified_gmt":"2010-07-24T08:32:24","slug":"cpu-envy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mpsharp.com\/?p=488","title":{"rendered":"CPU Envy"},"content":{"rendered":"

When I first started working for SCO in 1989, Xenix was the ONLY 32 bit operating system available for the Intel 386 platform.\u00a0\u00a0 In fact, in 1983, when Linus Torvals was 14 years old, SCO had Xenix running on two platforms:\u00a0 the Mac Lisa and the Intel 8086.\u00a0\u00a0 Yes,\u00a0 years before Tanenbaum’s Minux was released, SCO had a AT&T System III kernel running in 640k of memory.\u00a0\u00a0 And Microsoft even paid them to do it!\u00a0 But for that story, see wikipedia<\/a>.<\/p>\n

So when I arrived at SCO, their primary focus was still writing OS software and I was working on the X Windows port to the new SCO Unix, the successor to Xenix.\u00a0 I started with a Zenith 16MHz 386 on my desk, and at the time, that was considered a lot of CPU to dedicate to one user!\u00a0 But the best part of the job was being one of the first people to work on the 486 in order to get the X server running on the platform.\u00a0\u00a0 Of course, I didn’t get it on my desk, I had to drive over the hill to Olivetti for a few weeks (where people smoked in their cubicles!) and work on the machine there because there were so few of them.\u00a0\u00a0 Later on, I had the same task on one of the first Pentium systems in order to demo an X Windows application running faster than the Sun Workstations of the time.<\/p>\n

Those were the days when it was simple to tell which was the faster Intel Processor.\u00a0\u00a0 You just looked at the name: Pentium, Pentium II, Pentium III, and the MHz number and it was obvious.\u00a0 With the Pentium 4 we were up to 10K MIPS.\u00a0\u00a0 And then Intel decided it was better to confuse the market.\u00a0\u00a0 So now let me ask a simple question:\u00a0 Rank the following Intel processors in order of performance:<\/p>\n

Intel Core i7 820QM @ 1.73GHz<\/a><\/p>\n

Intel Core2 Quad @ 2.83GHz<\/a><\/p>\n

Intel Xeon X5670 @ 2.93GHz<\/a><\/p>\n

Well you have to figure this is easy,\u00a0 the Xeon line was introduced in 2001, the Core 2 in 2006 and the core I7 in 2010!\u00a0\u00a0 So even given the lower GHz number, the i7 must be the fastest of the bunch, right?\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Turns out to be just the opposite.\u00a0\u00a0 The i7 is the slowest processor listed, and the Xeon is the fasted, with the Core 2 winding up in the middle.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Of course, the Xeon platform has been redesigned a few times since 2001, and if you look at this handy chart from PassMark<\/a>, you’ll see that an Intel Core i7 X 980 @ 3.33GHz<\/a> does now top the list as Intel’s fastest processor, but the models vary widely below that depending on everything from cache size, to bus speed. (And they haven’t listed the Xeon x7350)\u00a0\u00a0 It’s been fairly widely recognized now that increasing clock speed<\/a> no longer gets you the performance returns it once did.<\/p>\n

But how does this help you decide which Intel CPU to buy?\u00a0 Well there’s one more piece of information you need, and that obviously is price.\u00a0\u00a0 In this case, the folks at pricewatch are nice enough to give us the latest CPU prices for both Intel and AMD<\/a> (ignore the PassMark price, it’s already out-of-date).\u00a0\u00a0 So now you can see how much each of these cost.\u00a0\u00a0 But the thing you really want is a mash-up page (sorry, someone with more time than I needs to build it) that shows you the PassMark\/$ figure.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Going back to the three I listed:<\/p>\n

Intel Core i7 820QM @ 1.73GHz<\/a> 3500\/$250 -> 14PM\/$<\/p>\n

Intel Core2 Quad Q9300 @ 2.50GHz<\/a> 3500\/$149.00 -> 23PM\/$<\/p>\n

Intel Xeon X5670 @ 2.93GHz<\/a> 9600\/$1359 -> 7PM\/$<\/p>\n

So it’s interesting that with the cheaper processors, you actually get more bang for the buck than the ultra high end.\u00a0\u00a0 Another thing that adds to the cost is the power draw.\u00a0\u00a0 So I’ve been eyeballing the Q9550S<\/a>, which is the low power version of the Q9550<\/a>.\u00a0 The lower power also means less heat, which means less fan noise, which is always a big win in a HTPC<\/a> to replace my poor Intel Core2 Duo E8500 @ 3.16GHz.<\/a><\/p>\n

The E8500 only rates 2400 on the PassMark test, while the Q9550 is at 4300.\u00a0 But once again we find at $148, the E8500 is getting 16PM\/$ while the Q9550S at $350 is only 12.\u00a0\u00a0 Now do I really need 2 more processor cores to rip all the old Disney video tapes to disk?\u00a0\u00a0 Probably not, but it’s not like you need 4WD on that SUV, but you sure like having it…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

When I first started working for SCO in 1989, Xenix was the ONLY 32 bit operating system available for the Intel 386 platform.\u00a0\u00a0 In fact, in 1983, when Linus Torvals was 14 years old, SCO had Xenix running on two platforms:\u00a0 the Mac Lisa and the Intel 8086.\u00a0\u00a0 Yes,\u00a0 years before Tanenbaum’s Minux was released,… Continue reading CPU Envy<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[29,49,51,82,84,118,119,132],"class_list":["post-488","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-windows","tag-benchmarks","tag-core2","tag-cpu","tag-i7","tag-intel","tag-price","tag-processor","tag-speed","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mpsharp.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/488","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mpsharp.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mpsharp.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mpsharp.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mpsharp.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=488"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mpsharp.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/488\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mpsharp.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mpsharp.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=488"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mpsharp.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}